Sunday, November 9, 2014

Samsung Galaxy Note Edge review: Innovation, experiment or gimmick?

by 



Just because you can do something, should you? Samsung thinks so. Its secondexperimentally screened phone taps into its hardware R&D and production clout to offer something not many other companies can make, let alone bring to the public outside of a fuzzy proof of concept. And so, following the Galaxy Round, here's the Galaxy Edge. If you take the basic shape and concept, it's the spitting image of the curved-screen Youm prototype spied at CES a little less than two years ago. Now, though, it's a for-real smartphone you can buy. I've been testing it out in Japan, where it launched instead of the Note 4, although both the Note 4 and the Note Edge will eventually be available in the US. Fortunately, despite the unusual, (addictively stroke-able) curved screen, it still packs all of the good things that made the Note 4 such a strong choice. But bragging rights aside, is there enough of an argument for a curved screen? Should you just get the Note 4 anyway?

GALLERY|23 PHOTOS

Samsung Galaxy Note Edge review

85
Samsung

Galaxy Note Edge

PROS
  • Beautiful, high-resolution curved display
  • Long battery life   
  • Good camera
  • Pretty much a Galaxy Note 4
CONS
  • Not enough uses for the curved edge
  • Not ideal for left-handed users
  • Pretty much a Galaxy Note 4
SUMMARY
The Galaxy Note Edge is an experiment, yet it's one that's able to stand on its strengths, despite any reservations you might have about that curved display. In short, you get all the benefits of the Galaxy Note 4, but with a hardware twist to set it apart. Unfortunately, there's that price.

    HARDWARE

    The Galaxy Note Edge grabs your attention. Its curves are subjective and divisive; my friends and colleagues have offered up reactions ranging from outright bemusement to adoration. The screen looks great, with the punchy contrast and sharpness that's been a Samsung flagship mainstay for years. We'll get back to that edge, but it's the headline part of a 5.6-inch Quad-HD+ display. ("Plus" here, in comparison to the Note 4, means an additional 160 rows of pixels.) This means a little chunk of extra screen makes the phone just less than 4mm wider, and around 2mm shorter, than the Note 4.

    The screen is marginally smaller than the Note 4, despite the cranked-up pixel count. Like the Note 4, text pops a little more, and pictures you take with the 16MP camera are obviously better replicated on the Note Edge's screen. Color purists: Yep, the shades are still a little overdone, but you can choose from a few custom color palettes if you're not a fan of high-contrast menus and photos.
    Regardless, you get the feeling that this is the bleeding edge of Samsung's phone-making skills, right here in your hand, and that's because of the curve. Samsung's explained, officially, that it put the curve to the right to replicate how we read books. Lefties aren't going to be too happy, but the one-sided design is what gives the phone a kick. (For the 10 percent of our readers that are left-handed, you can flip the phone around and the screen will follow, but the physical home button, ports and volume controls (let alone the mic for voice calls), will all be in nonsensical places. We drafted in lefties to compare it with the Note 4 and the latter was deemed much more comfortable. (What's the use in a curved screen if it's in the wrong place?)
    The company was able to curve the display using the same technology it featured on the Galaxy Round, but there's more emphasis here on giving purpose to the uniqueness of the Edge. Samsung's crafted what's best described as a special kind of edge "widget," but I'll explain what sort of value it adds in the software section. There's some purpose to it -- but perhaps not quite enough.

    One of the best things about the Galaxy Note Edge is how much it resembles the Note 4. In fact, barring that giveaway right edge, from nearly all angles it looks like the Note 4, and that's a good thing. It has nearly all the same design touches and material finishes as the Note 4. As my colleague Brad mentioned in his review, the leather-like backing on Samsung's phones this year is much improved: It looks and feels much classier, and the fake stitches are gone too.
    There are also machined-aluminum buttons to match the sides, an IR remote and headphone socket up top, and a USB charger, a downgrade from the Note 3, at the base. This means slower transfers, but I can cope for the aesthetics. In time-honored Samsung style, there's also a physical home button with capacitive multitasking and back buttons balancing out the lower bezel. Lastly, there's a built-in heart rate monitor nestled alongside the flash, while a single speaker grille sits in the lower-left corner, ready to be obscured by your hand when you hold it. Whoops.


    There's been no corners cut with regards to specifications -- fantastically, it goes toe to toe with the Note 4. It's the same high-resolution (2,560 × 1,600) screen -- we're certain a mere 1080p "Plus" curved display would have been cheaper to make -- as well as a 2.7GHz processor, 3GB of RAM and 32GB of storage (and a 64GB option), with a microSD slot for expansion. On paper, the only place that's been limited is the battery: a smaller 3,000mAh pack powers this special edition Note, compared to 3,220mAh in Note number four.

    The stylus is another product of Samsung's collaboration with Montblanc: Multiple sensitivity levels and a nice grippy surface are the highlights. I'd point you to our Note 4 review for a closer look, but suffice to say that the stylus has turned into a real selling point for the Note series, with one caveat: There's a steep learning curve to using it. After using the Galaxy Note 2 for some time, the extra features and changes meant I came often unstuck at the start. My personal favorite, which I used a surprising number of times, was Image Clip, which allows you to copy and paste parts of your screen -- maps, parts of an image -- and save it for reference or use later. Combining my scraps with a messaging app was simplicity. The new pen even lets you batch select parts of text or even files and pictures -- yes, a real productivity tool!

    ONE-HANDED USE

    Disclaimer: Your hand is different from mine, but it seems only fair to do the same comparison we did for the Note 4. The Note Edge is wider than the Note 4, and although I've only spent a brief time with the latter, the curved, tapered side of the Note Edge seemed to fit rather snugly into the corner of my palm. I never found it uncomfortable, but please don't forget it remains a big phone. Both come with software tricks like shrinkable keyboards as well as a new, tiny floating menu that can be stuck to the outer edge of the screen. This duplicates the capacitive button row, which could be a solution of sorts for lefties. I can even make this secondary menu transparent, allowing me to maintain all that screen space. The ability to shrink the likes of Chrome and Google Maps to a popup window and layer it on top of other apps is also useful; I'd love to see something similar on the iPhone 6 Plus.

    And how does Apple's biggest phone compare to the Note Edge? Well, both remain unwieldy to grip, and the Note Edge is wider. However, the edged screen nuzzles into my hand better and those software tweaks mentioned above give it the advantage. However, just like the stylus, there's a while before you get the knack of all the little provisions Samsung's made to ease users into this screen size.

    SOFTWARE

    If you're looking to learn more about the stylus' uses, I'd advise a quick read of Brad's Galaxy Note 4 review, because the setup is identical here. Yes, there are TouchWiz bits running on Android 4.4 KitKat, but Samsung continues to clear away unnecessary bloat and options. It's still a work in progress, though, and I feel the settings menus are particularly obtuse compared to other Android phones -- and especially iOS. It takes some getting used to.
    But let's focus on what's different here: that edge. There are two display modes you can flit between: a slender, unassuming bar that can display a customized message and a more substantial column that attempts to offer extra functionality, notifications or context-dependent menus for certain apps, like the camera. When it's expanded, the UI is a basic row of icons, which you can navigate with a little swipe. This may look a little unusual, but swishing through the various mini-screens (you can configure what it shows, and even install third-party "edges"), is immensely satisfying.
    While you can cycle through up to seven edges (why the limit?), each can also be toggled off, so you could strip it down to simply a notification and app shortcut bar. Or you could keep seven different things there: weather, stocks, bizarre memory-matching game, your pedometer stats or a Japan-only navigation bar that'll offer traffic alerts and your nearest train station. Predictably, there's a way to go on these edge apps -- did Samsung not learn from those early wearables? The edge could be so much more useful with Spotify controls or a Gmail notification bar that offers more than just a number of unread emails.

    The edge of the screen also comes into its own when Samsung went to the effort to add dedicated menus. For the camera, this means your viewfinder isn't obscured, which is nice. Similarly, when playing video, you get the fullscreen playback, and tapping the screen brings up controls along the curved edge. Notifications will also appear here, which is a nice touch. However, app-dependent edge functions stop there, and the camera and video player both seem like the most useful scenarios for it.
    I ended up using the edge screen differently. I felt like my apps belong better on the side, and customized the favorites edge to include all my regular apps like Chrome and Maps. Rather than squeeze as many of these vital apps onto a home screen (or two), I can house them on that swipeable side. The screen can then showcase wallpaper, or suitably pretty widgets. Apps are then not a button press, but a swish away. Samsung (and Apple) might not like it, but it reminds me very much of my Mac setup.

    You can also turn the edge into a centimetered ruler. Not sure how much you're going to use that function -- I didn't use it once. Something I did like was the night clock setting, which, when it hits a certain prescribed time, will light up the edge with a simple clock readout.
    These might be the best parts, but the marvel remains the technical accomplishment of the curved screen. The applications for it don't quite amount to enough -- at least right now. What does the edge lack? What do I want? I'm not even sure, but when text scrolls down the edge and you're facing the right side, the edge, of the phone, it's upside-down. If Samsung were to reverse it, then it'd be upside-down when you're using the thing. It's particularly frustrating for the Twitter widget, which scrolls through highlights.

    CAMERA

    Again, Samsung didn't cut any corners when it came to the phone's imaging prowess. The Note Edge packs a 16-megapixel camera, with Samsung's "smart OIS" intended to eke the light (and detail) in tougher lighting. The front-facing camera is also a top-end sensor compared to the competition, 3.7 megapixels with an f/1.9 lens. There's also a (bizarre-sounding) selfie mode that stitches a trio of pictures together for widescreen, "best friends!" capture -- when you have more than two BFFs.
    GALLERY|17 PHOTOS

    Samsung Galaxy Note Edge photo samples



    While I'm not a huge selfie taker, you'll have to ask our Senior Selfie Editor, but I do take a whole lot of photos with my smartphone, so I was interested to see how Samsung's newest smartphone camera handled (yup, it's in the Note 4, too). Fortunately, I spent time with the Note Edge in Tokyo and New York: two places where sample photos can be done pretty much everywhere.

    All told, it's an excellent camera. The image stabilizing works well on all the neon lights that pepper Tokyo, while even people were neatly captured. There's some noise, but it compares favorably against older Galaxy phones. Daylight meant effortless captures and some really nice shots, if I say so myself. Focus was swift, and auto white balance seemed to gauge scenes perfectly. If you have a proclivity for HDR, rest assured the Edge does an excellent job there.

    PERFORMANCE AND BATTERY LIFE

    SAMSUNG GALAXY NOTE EDGESAMSUNG GALAXY NOTE 4SAMSUNG GALAXY S5IPHONE 6 PLUS
    Quadrant 2.023,86124,42524,714N/A
    Vellamo 3.01,8821,8081,656N/A
    3DMark IS Unlimited19,91220,69217,95417,902
    SunSpider 1.0 (ms)788793820388
    GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen (fps)18.418.811.518.2
    CF-Bench40,14343,23433,351N/A
    SunSpider: Lower scores are better.
    It bears repeating: Samsung's treated the Galaxy Edge buyer to some of the best components underneath that curved display: 3GB of RAM to ensure multitask windowing runs smoothly, and a quad-core Snapdragon 805 processor to back it up. Like the Note 4, lag and slowdown simply didn't happen. However, there were the occasional hiccups where the edge widget would refuse to cycle to the next page. The only fix I found was to reset the phone. It's a shame, as it's a minor issue that stops the phone getting full performance marks.
    The Edge goes toe to toe with the Note 4, because well, it's pretty much the same phone. But how about the smaller battery, one of the only hardware differences? With a little more screen resolution and less capacity on the cell, we feared the worse. Well, in our battery of... battery tests, it lies somewhere between the Note and Galaxy S series. It's not quite as good as the former, but better than the latter: A very heavy day of use (lots of maps, lots of photos) will tucker out the phone before bedtime. That said, in our video-loop battery test at half brightness, the Note Edge's 3,000mAh cell ran out after just over 10 hours. With more moderate use, the phone would arrive back at my house with around 20 percent left, enough to notify me that I needed to charge. The fingerprint sensor to unlock the phone is more sensitive and accurate than preceding Galaxy devices, although the heart rate sensor on the back of my Note Edge didn't seem to pick up my pulse at all. I wasn't dead, and a second Note Edge we picked up for testing did offer up readings swiftly inside the phone's S Health app.

    THE COMPETITION

    When it comes to big smartphones, we've never had quite as many strong options. What was once the domain of only Samsung and LG now has competition from Apple and even smaller upstarts like OnePlus. Samsung has launched the Note Edge mere months after its own Note 4, and the phones are identical in so many ways. The major difference isn't that the battery's smaller on the Edge, but the price: off-contract the Note 4 comes in at around $800. The Note Edge, meanwhile is priced at $950 -- just shy of 200 bucks more. On-contract pricing on AT&T comes to around $400, while the Note 4 and the iPhone 6 Plus ring in at $300. Apple's iPhone 6 Plus, lacking a stylus, but coming with the slicker iOS 8, starts at $750 off-contract for a 16GB model. Unlike both of this year's Galaxy Notes, however, you can't upgrade the storage -- something worth bearing in mind. Then there's the OnePlus One: a lower-resolution (but still gorgeous) 5.5-inch 1080p display, no stylus, no add-on storage, but you could buy three and have spare change for cases compared to the Galaxy Note Edge. It boils down to how much you want a stylus, and how much you're willing to pay for a phone that's not like anything else.

    WRAP-UP

    Is the Note Edge a gimmick? It's hard to say, but I don't think the curved display is a bad thing. The best part is that even without the edge, you've still got, for all intents and purposes, a Galaxy Note 4, with a stylus, power, long battery life and a capable camera. The more I used the Note Edge, the less the edge part seemed to matter: I'd use the shortcuts to apps from the edge, but gradually disabled most of the widgets. Pervasive uses for the curve aren't quite there. What did remain was how gosh-darn eye-catching the display was, augmented by that curved AMOLED glow. And if foldable smartphones and tablets are going to happen, if devices with more useful, innovative displays are to appear, phones like the Note Edge are the iterations that need to happen. If you liked any of the previous Galaxy Notes, or were at least intrigued by them, then the Galaxy Note Edge deserves the same amount of attention -- even if, at $980 off-contract, you're really paying for that progress.

    IOS 8.1/iOS 8 Fastest Jailbreak iPhone 6,5S and iTunes Unlock Using Cydia is INSTANT Today

    By WNT9

    Good News, we can finally unlock and jailbreak our devices on iOS 8.0.2 but only a few are able to unlock and jailbreak iOS 8.1 on iPhone 6,6 Plus 5, 5S or 5C iOS 8. The online unlocking company, UJB has recently been voted the fastest iPhone unlocking iOS 8.1 service on the Internet. The company provides fast and smooth service to gadget users as per their demands. If you want to unlock iPhone that you own or Jailbreak, now you can Unlock the iPhone 6,5, 5S, 5C, 4S, 4, 3GS, 3G on iOS 8 and iOS 8.0.2 on all Modem Baseband by Apple iTunes Unlock with Jailbreak included with Cydia installed, NO Gevey Sim, RSIM or other SIM Adapters.. If you want to unlock iPhone that you own or Jailbreak, now you can Unlock the iPhone 6,5, 5S, 5C, 4S, 4, 3GS, 3G on iOS 8 and iOS 8.0.2 or 8.1 on all Modem Baseband by Apple iTunes Unlock with Jailbreak included with Cydia installed, NO GeveySim, RSIM.
    www.Unlock-Jailbreak.net Team Can now Permanently factory IMEI unlock and jailbreak your iPhone 5S,5C,5,4S,6 with jailbreak and get Cydia Installed on iOS 8.1 and the new iOS 8 untethered by white listing your IMEI in the Apple iTunes database. FREE and INSTANT carrier checking on the official team’s site. Other sites make you wait hours if not days if you choose to check your carrier first, and also will refuse to refund if you choose the wrong network when purchasing an unlock. However with just your IMEI they give you everything you need -Instant Access to software and guaranteeing you are purchasing the correct product. We take the guessing out of unlocking.
    To Unlock and Jailbreak your iPhone visit the official team’s website Available Here
    Jailbreak and Unlock is a process that allows iPad, iPhone 5S,5C,5,4S,6 iOS 8.1 or iOS 8 and iPod Touch users to gain root access to the command line of the operating system thus removing any limitations imposed upon them by Apple. Once jailbroken, iPhone users are able to download many unlock iphone extensions and themes previously unavailable through the App Store via installers and generally exercise complete ownership of their purchased product including installing non Apple operating systems such as Linux. A jailbroken iPad, iPhone or iPod Touch running iOS is still able to use the App Store and iTunes. Install MANY applications for FREE and use ANY SIM worldwide!!!
    Unlock Jailbreak Team is a trustworthy company with support staff based in the USA – the contact number is clearly displayed on the website and they can be reached between the hours of 9.30am and 5.30pm GMT. All the unlocks are guaranteed to work, No quibbles, no questions, no hassle. Factory Unlock all iPhones regardless of bootloader, baseband and firmware version up to the latest iOS and beyond (if you don’t know what this means, don’t worry – it simply means they can unlock any handset). Official/Permanent/IMEI Unlock iPhone 5S,5C or 5,4S,4 Locked to AT&T, Sprint, Verizon, Telstra, T-mobile, Optus, Vodafone, Telstra, Three, Virgin, SFR, Moviestar, Telia, Telenor, Vodafone, Tele 2, O2 from USA, UK, Australia, France, Canada, Germany and others thanks to the Unlock-Jailbreak.net Team iOS 8.
    In just a few minutes, whether you are computer savvy or not, you will be able to unlock any iPhone with ease. Whether your iPhone has early software or the latest iOS firmware the software will unlock it all for a low one-time payment, which includes LIFETIME updates for all future iPhone unlock Updates Never pay for an iPhone Unlock again with our LIFETIME MEMBERSHIP for a one-time payment.
    It’s Simple: Your device’s IMEI code will be entered into the Apple unlock database, after this step your iPhone will be marked as factory unlocked device. Now you can use your iPhone on any networks because your iPhone is factory unlocked. After this process you can update the device to any new & old apple iOS 8.0.2 to 7.0.6 firmware/baseband including the newest iOS 8 8.1 for iPhone. Unlock iPhone software is GUARANTEED to unlock and/or jailbreak your iPhone 4/S ,3GS, 3G, 2G. Now iPhone 5/S/C, the iPhone unlocking software works with any firmware version including the latest ios 8.0.2 or 8.1 and iOS 8, along with all previous firmware versions (iOS 7 or iOS 8.1 iOS 8 etc) And of course, software can jailbreak and unlock all older iPhones and iTouch models as well.

    A Simple Chrome Extension Encrypts Facebook, Twitter, and Gmail Messages

    undefined



    If you want to make sure you're sending a secure message, there's a whole slew of privacy-minded services that include encryption these days. But sometimes you just want to send something on Facebook without feeling like you're a prime candidate for digital eavesdropping. That's where ShadowCrypt comes in.
    Researchers at UC Berkeley and the University of Maryland created the browser extension, which lets people exchange encrypted messages from most popular social web apps, including Gmail, Facebook, Reddit, and Twitter. It's a research tool that shows that encryption on big-name mainstream web services is possible.
    ShadowCrypt is compatible with over 14 popular web services. You install it on Chrome, and then you can generate encryption keys for any of its compatible services. Then you share the encryption key with the person the message is intended for. This means they'll be able to see what you've sent, but everyone else (including the site operator) will see digital gibberish.
    I tested it out on Twitter and it was easy enough to use, just toggle the extension on and type what you want. There's a default key that anyone using ShadowEncrypt has access to, so you have to get a new one if you want yours to be properly locked-down (I just used the default here because I didn't actually have anything top-secret to tweet).

    How to open files in desktop apps from Google Drive on the web


    Ian Pau



    On Wednesday, Google further blended the lines between online and offline with a neat little browser extension that lets you automatically open documents from the Google Drive website in your installed desktop apps. You can, for example, open any Word documents in the desktop version of Word instead of working on them in your browser.
    Getting the new feature to work is not quite as simple as installing the browser extension, however—though it's close. Here's how to set it up.

    First install Google Drive

    Before we get to the browser extension, you first need the latest version of the Google Drive desktop app. This is Google Drive's Dropbox clone, which puts a local Drive folder in the Windows File Explorer and syncs the folder's files with Google Drive.
    I'm guessing that most Google fans already have the Drive app installed. But if you don't, after installation wait for Google Drive to sync with your desktop before proceeding.

    Get the extension and switch to the new Google Drive

    drivecontext
    With a few downloads from Google you can open Drive files from the web on the desktop with a right-click.
    Now it's time to install Google'sApplication Launcher for Drive from the Chrome Web Store.
    Once that's done, open Google Drive in Chrome and make sure you are using the new, revamped version of the web app. If you're not. there should be an option to switch to it at the top of your Google Drive dashboard. Otherwise, follow theinstructions on the Google Drive help pages to get the new version.
    Next, right-click on any file that's in a non-Google Drive format, such as an Excel spreadsheet, Word document, or photo and select Open with from the contextual menu. You should see a list of compatible desktop apps.
    If you don't see any of your desktop apps, reboot Chrome and try again.
    Remember that this option only works with document formats recognized by your desktop apps. You cannot use this feature to open documents in Google Drive's proprietary formats.

    Not perfect, but handy for Google Drive types

    likeopenword
    In my tests, Google Drive wasn't able to correctly identify and suggest all of my desktop apps. The open source GIMP photo editor, for example, didn't appear in the menu for JPG and other image types.
    But mainstream programs like the Microsoft Office suite, as well as Thunderbird, Sublime Text 2, and even HipChat (for images) were all there.
    Opening files from Drive on your desktop takes a few seconds longer than you'd expect, but it does work. Changes you make to your documents are saved back to Google Drive, but you may need to give Google a few minutes before you'll see the changes reflected online.

    Why would you want this?

    Google's new set-up is neat, but it does beg the question why not just open your files locally instead of messing with the web app? After all, you have to install Google Drive first and then pull down all your documents to your desktop anyway.
    I suppose it comes down to convenience. If you're more accustomed to living in the browser, right-clicking inside the web app is a simpler workflow than re-navigating your way to the document in File Explorer or an Office app.
    Plus, it's kinda neat and who doesn't love to have another way to open apps?
    Google's new feature works on Mac and Windows.





    A lesson for Google on gender bias



    Google Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt holds his new book “How Google Works” as he sits and listens during a panel discussion on the future of the internet in Tokyo on, Nov. 4, 2014. (Kiyoshi Ota/Bloomberg)




    Google recently made headlines by announcing a new commitment to root out implicit gender bias through increased awareness — but the authors of the following post are wondering whether Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt got the memo. Schmidt is promoting his new bestselling book, “How Google Works,” with an online slide show presentation that has been viewed by more than half a million people — but that Shifra Bronznick and Hillary Leone say is riddled with gender bias and show it, slide by slide.

    Bronznick is the founder and president of Advancing Women Professionals and the Jewish Community (AWP). She has provided strategic counsel to dozens of organizations including Catalyst, Medicare Rights Center, Educational Alliance, National Council for Research on Women, Women Donors Network, AUBURN, Building Movement Project, the Revson Foundation, Women Moving Millions, and American Jewish World Service. The leadership consultant to the White House Project for a decade, she designed its National Women’s Leadership Summits, established its Corporate Council, as well as “Women Rule,” a partnership with Oprah magazine. She teaches strategic leadership at New York University’s Wagner Graduate School of Public Service.

    Leone is AWP’s senior strategist and principal of Cabengo LLC, an award-winning digital strategy and design studio. She has worked with leading cultural and educational institutions and non-profit organizations, including Harvard University, the Smithsonian Institution, the University of Pennsylvania, Storm King Art Center, Georgetown University, Columbia University, New York University, and Contemporary Jewish Museum. Her work has been recognized by the Webby Awards, South by Southwest Interactive, ID Magazine, and others. As senior strategist to AWP since 2005, she has helped craft AWP’s story of social change, from its roots as a national non-profit dedicated to women’s advancement to its evolution as a network of catalysts. Prior to founding Cabengo, Hillary had been an internationally recognized installation and new media artist.

    Here Bronznick and Leone offer an idea for Google:



    By Shifra Bronznick and Hillary Leone


    OK, Google! Here’s what bias looks like. Open the visual preview of Eric Schmidt and Jonathon Rosenberg new book, “How Google Works,” and look at how men and women are depicted.

    The slideshow opens with illustrations of Eric and Jonathan – but these aren’t the only men in the deck.

















    Recently Google made headlines by announcing a new commitment to root out implicit bias through increased awareness. It looks like Chairman Schmidt did not get the memo.

    In a Google Ventures video posted last month on YouTube entitled“Unconscious Bias @ Work,” Brian Welle, Google’s director of people analytics, claims that scientists at Google are on the leading edge of change.


    “I want to be upfront that researchers and psychologists have been very, very good at demonstrating that there is bias… But there is no incentive whatsoever to show how to get rid of it. Now, we in organizations, of course, are on the other side. It’s like, ‘Okay, we know that it happens, we want to get rid of it.’ So we’re probably the vanguard of what’s going to happen in this space. So if you’ve got ideas on how we can actually combat it, let me know, let each other know.”

    OK Google, we have an idea for you: Acknowledge your own bias.

    And then get to work. Because achieving gender equity demands the same level of creativity, ingenuity, innovation and accountability that drives Google’s most ambitious projects, from driverless cars to Google Glass.

    It also requires championship from the top.

    Here's Why Samsung Is Pining for Apple Inc.’s Chip Business

    DigiTimes asserts in a recent article that Samsung (NASDAQOTH: SSNLF  ) and Taiwan Semiconductor (NYSE: TSM  ) are locked in a battle for Apple's (NASDAQ: AAPL  ) A9 chip orders. According to the article, citing "industry sources," Apple is "expected to confirm the chip supplier or suppliers by the end of 2014."
    What I found particularly interesting in the article, though, is that Samsung is reportedly "offered lower quotes" than Taiwan Semiconductor has in order to grab this business. DigiTimes also points out that Samsung is able to supply additional chips and services, such as flash memory and "backend services" (i.e., packaging and test), as well.
    Given that Samsung's mobile device business is now seeing relatively weak operating profit, it seems that the company might be shifting its focus on its semiconductor business. This, in my view, is probably the correct strategy for the company to pursue; here's why.
    Semiconductors have a much higher barrier to entry than do mobile devicesThe market for mobile devices has a very low barrier to entry: just about any company can decide to pour the money into building an Android smartphone. While many continue to point the finger at Apple for Samsung's mobile weakness, I would venture a guess that Samsung's profit squeeze is caused at least as much by the competition at the low end and the midrange (where Apple does not play) as it is by the high-end competition from Apple.
    It's very hard to command gargantuan profits on what are essentially commodity Android devices.
    However, semiconductors are difficult. The research and development required to develop and deploy a world-class, high-yielding, leading-edge semiconductor logic process is huge. Further, even with the right investment level, developing semiconductor manufacturing technology is fundamentally hard and getting harder.
    That's good news for Samsung ...The good news is that with so few companies able to actually build leading-edge process technologies, Samsung could build itself a very profitable business as Taiwan Semiconductor has. Indeed, with a proven track record of developing viable manufacturing processes, coupled with significant financial might, it wouldn't be a shocker to see Samsung thrive as a general purpose chip foundry over the long haul.
    However, there's one snag that could serve as potential headwinds to Samsung's foundry ambitions.
    Samsung is in direct competition with most, if not all, leading-edge customersIn the foundry market, the two fabless customers that seem to require the most leading-edge technology volume are Qualcomm (NASDAQ: QCOM  and Apple. The problem here is that Samsung's internal chip teams compete directly with Qualcomm for spots in Samsung Mobile's devices, and Apple obviously competes directly with Samsung mobile.
    Now, this didn't stop Apple from using Samsung for the vast majority of the iPhones sold to date, and it didn't stop Qualcomm from having Samsung build some of its stand-alone baseband chips. However, I would imagine that the fact that Samsung is a direct competitor to both of these companies in their respective core businesses could lead to some hesitation among Samsung's potential foundry customers.
    That said, if Samsung has the best technology available at the best prices available, it's hard to see the fabless companies thumbing their noses at Samsung's offer, potential conflicts of interests notwithstanding.
    What does this mean for TSMC?If the DigiTimes story is correct and Samsung is offering very aggressive pricing to bring over Apple, then this could potentially be a problem for Taiwan Semiconductor. Given the position Samsung is in, Apple probably isn't the only company that Samsung is offering aggressive pricing to.
    Indeed, DigiTimes reported back in July that the "Samsung/Globalfoundries team" landed 14-nanometer orders from Qualcomm and Apple. In fact, a quick search on LinkedIn reveals the profile of a Qualcomm engineer who claims to be designing next-generation Qualcomm chips on Samsung's 14-nanometer process:
    undefined
    Source: LinkedIn
    It seems likely that Taiwan Semiconductor is going to have quite the battle on its hands to maintain its substantial customer base for leading-edge foundry technology. 
    Foolish bottom lineIn light of the weak performance from Samsung's mobile division, which I believe to be largely out of Samsung's control, it seems smart for the company to build out its semiconductor business even further. The barriers to entry for leading-edge foundry are quite high, and although the total profit to be had here isn't as high as what Samsung saw from the mobile business at its peak, it's likely a more sustainable business over the long run

    What Chip Will Power the Apple Inc. iPad Pro?

    Macotakara recently reported some details about Apple's (NASDAQ: AAPL  ) long-rumored iPad Pro. The report appears to claim (at least if I'm reading the translation correctly) that this next-generation iPad will feature a 12.2-inch LCD panel, come in thicker than Apple's just-released iPad Air 2, and potentially feature stereo audio. The report also appears to state that this new iPad Pro could launch in the third quarter of 2015.
    While this isn't much to go on, I think that it's worth exploring the potential performance characteristics of whatever chip Apple puts into this purported iPad Pro.
    Understanding the usage model of such a deviceThe Macotakara report suggests the supposed iPad Pro will compete with the Microsoft(NASDAQ: MSFT  ) Surface Pro 3. While it's important not to read too much into that, a device that "competes" with the Surface Pro 3 would loosely fit this description: a device that offers a compelling "traditional" PC (or, in Apple's case, Mac) experience, as well as a strong tablet experience.
    Apple CEO Tim Cook has criticized Microsoft's strategy of trying to turn "tablets into PCs and PCs into tablets." This means that if Apple is actually pursuing this iPad Pro, it has fundamentally devised a way to offer the best of both worlds without the compromises that convertible devices have brought. 
    For example, a common complaint that users seem to have with respect to the Surface Pro is that placing the device on one's lap and trying to type is difficult. For Yoga-like devices, the "tablet" mode is often viewed as unwieldy since the resulting "tablet" is much thicker than traditional iPad-like devices.
    It begins with the choice of microprocessorWhile I could write endless reams of copy trying to speculate what Apple might do with the iPad Pro, I'm probably not going to correctly guess the exact functionality and usage model the company might be gunning for with this rumored device. So I'm not going to try.
    However, I do follow the world of mobile system-on-chip products quite closely, which emboldens me to guess at what a system-on-chip designed specifically for an iPad Pro would look like.
    A bigger, bolder chip might be requiredAn iPad Pro would almost certainly cost more than an iPad Air. This means Apple would have more freedom to use a higher-quality display than what is found on the iPad Air, and its chip teams would likely have the freedom to pursue larger, more complex processors.
    Furthermore, given that the usage model for such an iPad Pro is likely to be significantly more sophisticated than what the iPad mini and iPad Air family of tablets enable, Apple might do a custom system-on-chip for the iPad Pro rather than reuse the chip that goes into the next iPad Air.
    What would an iPad Pro focused chip look like?Note carefully the timing cited by Macotakara: a third-quarter 2015 launch. If all goes well for Apple, it might be able to build its next-generation family of processors on a 14- or 16-nanometer process from either Samsung (NASDAQOTH: SSNLF  or Taiwan Semiconductor (NYSE: TSM  , respectively. If not, next year's A-chips might end up being new designs on this year's familiar 20-nanometer manufacturing process.
    At any rate, based on what Apple did with the A8 and the A8X systems-on-chip this year, Apple apparently put in two CPU cores and Imagination Technologies' (NASDAQOTH:IGNMF  ) second-most powerful graphics IP into the iPhone-focused chip. The iPad-focused chip now gets three CPU cores and Imagination's best graphics processor. Assuming next year's iPhone chip is called A9, and the iPad chip is A9X, Apple could do one of three things:
    1. Faster A9X: Apple could simply take the A9X and run the CPU and graphics cores at higher frequencies. This would consume more power, but the iPad Pro would likely feature a larger battery than what is found inside the iPad Air.
    2. A9X+: Apple could put together a custom chip for the iPad Pro and call it A9X+. This could feature an even larger graphics block, particularly as Imagination has implied that future PowerVR GPUs will feature a broader range of performance levels. Apple could also, in this case, throw in a fourth CPU core.
    3. Do nothing: Apple could just reuse the A9X as-is with no changes from the variant deployed in the next-generation iPad Air.
    If I had to guess, I would say that option 1 is the most likely, followed by 2 and then 3. Option 1 would give Apple more leverage from the design work that it got with the A9X, particularly as Apple seems uninterested in putting its top-of-the-line A-chips inside the iPad mini. Option 2 would likely yield the optimal product solution, but it would be the most expensive.
    Option 3 is obviously the cheapest, but Apple would run the risk of not providing enough extra over the iPad Air to offer a compelling value proposition.
    Foolish takeawayWe don't actually know whether Apple's iPad Pro is even coming, or if it is, what will be inside. However, I think that if Apple does release an iPad Pro, processor performance will be critical to enabling the best user experience. To that end, I hope Apple builds a custom chip for the device, but expect that, for cost reasons, the company will use a higher-clocked variant of the chip it puts into the next iPad Air.